Not much to do with my review but I just wanted to say that. I have 2 items and I'll put them up in reverse order.

Lina CL (Micro Central, ie. Joyce area)
Spurred on by Big Al's review of Lina (http://www.bestescortreviews.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=80348) I took a run at her myself. Big wrote a great review but my take on Lina differs somewhat. My experience with her was similar to Big's but I just didn't get off on Lina as much. She does have great tits--but the rest of the package looked a little tired to me. She's definitely over 30, I hated the tats (painted on as they were) and skinny legs with a square butt.

The session was OK although I did feel a couple of times that the moans and shaking were more to get me to come quicker. Then at the end when I gave her the $.4 she told me it was $.5. OK small dif but I was sure the guy had quoted the first and that's what Big Al said. Anyway, gave it in as good a grace as possible but in todays market I think she's more in MM's league than say Tom's. And no disrespect to anyone who thinks she's great--subjective it is.

Bella/Lianna/Maki
I reviewed Bella a little while ago.
Based on one particular review I decided to try Maki (ads in GS Massage). Called and got location--same apt as Bella, OK I thought they share it. Got to the door and was met by--ready for it--Bella. I said I came to see Maki, she said "Maki's just a paper name..." WTF is a 'paper name?' Name in the paper? Gotta say I almost gave in and did her 'cause she looked very sexy in her black coctail dress but I didn't. So are they the same girl? Or do they just rotate and use the name that the pooner called? Who knows? Who cares? If I go up and like her, don't care what fake name she uses. On the other hand it makes sorting out reviews a little tough.

Peace, Love, ... love a piece...